Screening Hysteroscopy Before IVF. When Is It Really Necessary?

Screening Hysteroscopy Before IVF. When Is It Really Necessary?

Recent data, especially from the ESHRE 2023 meeting, shows that doing a hysteroscopy before the very first IVF try doesn’t really improve the chances of a live birth. So, if you don’t have any specific risk factors, this test probably won’t make things better.

But, things change if you’ve had trouble with embryo transfers not working. If you’ve had two to four tries that didn’t work out, then a hysteroscopy might be a good idea. It can spot (and sometimes fix) problems in your uterus that didn’t show up on an ultrasound. These issues are found in about 25% of these cases, which could explain why things didn’t work before.

Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: Useful or Unnecessary for Your Fertility Journey?

Click on the image to watch the video on YouTube.


📌 What Will You Discover in This Article?


What Is Screening Hysteroscopy?

Screening hysteroscopy, also known as diagnostic hysteroscopy, is an examination that allows direct exploration of the inside of the uterus and the cervical canal using a very thin instrument called a hysteroscope. Unlike transvaginal ultrasound or hysterosalpingography, which provide indirect imaging, this technique offers direct, real-time visualization of the endometrium.

In my 30+ years of practice, I’ve seen how helpful hysteroscopy is for spotting small problems that don’t always show up on regular scans. Think of it like a tiny camera that goes inside your uterus. If ultrasound is like looking at a house from the street, hysteroscopy lets you check out every room inside. Often, the important clues for understanding what’s going on are found in these little details.

The Goals of Hysteroscopy Before IVF

Hysteroscopy before IVF can notably:

💡 Important: We know hysteroscopy can find problems. The real question is: when does it actually help you get pregnant?


Hysteroscopy Before the First IVF: What Do Recent Studies Say?

The Cochrane Review and Multicenter Studies

A Cochrane review from 2019 initially suggested a possible benefit of hysteroscopy before IVF, with a relative risk of 1.26 for live births. However, this analysis had significant limitations:

There are a few things that might explain why the results sometimes don’t match up.

First off, when you look at all the studies together, there’s a lot of difference between them. This means the results change quite a bit from one study to the next, which makes it harder to draw solid conclusions.

Also, the people in the studies aren’t all the same. Some studies have people doing IVF for the first time, while others only look at people who’ve had it fail before. Mixing these groups can make it hard to see if anything is really working.

Lastly, the way the studies were done wasn’t always the best. They had unlike rules for who could join, followed different steps, and might have had some biases. All of this makes it tricky to figure out what’s really going on.

The Decisive Point

Here’s something really interesting: When researchers only looked at studies that followed really careful methods, any possible advantage of hysteroscopy went away.

The risk became neutral,meaning that in the best studies, hysteroscopy didn’t really change the results, especially when it came to things like getting pregnant or having a baby.

The inSIGHT and TROPHY Studies: The Definitive Answer

Two large multicenter randomized studies settled the question:

inSIGHT Study (Netherlands, 2016)

We did a study with 750 women who were about to try IVF for the first time. Before starting, they all had a normal uterine ultrasound, meaning there were no visible problems inside the uterus.

We split the women into two groups:

The results were pretty straightforward: the live birth rates were about the same in both groups.

The stats showed a relative risk of 1.06, with a confidence interval of 0.93 to 1.20. Basically, if you have a normal ultrasound, getting a hysteroscopy before your first IVF doesn’t really make a difference in whether you’ll have a baby.

This backs up what other studies have found: if there’s no reason to think there’s something wrong, checking the uterus beforehand doesn’t seem to help with live birth rates.

TROPHY Study (European Multicenter, 2016)

A study looked at 702 women who had two to four failed embryo transfers to see if extra testing would help.

At first, all the women had ultrasounds that looked okay, meaning there were no obvious problems.

But when they did more tests, they found issues in 24% of the women. That might sound like a lot, but only 4% of those problems could actually be fixed.

Here’s the most important thing: Even after finding and fixing those problems, the number of live births didn’t really increase.

Basically, even though they found some things wrong after a few failed transfers, fixing them didn’t help the women get pregnant in this study.

Furthermore, the study by Ben Abid and colleagues (2021) confirmed these results: 23.9% pregnancy rate with hysteroscopy vs 19.3% without hysteroscopy (p = 0.607).

Current ESHRE Recommendation (2023)

According to the ESHRE recommendations on repeated implantation failure, screening hysteroscopy is currently not recommended for routine clinical use before the first IVF.

SituationRecommendationLevel of Evidence
Before 1st IVF with normal ultrasoundNot recommendedGrade A (strong)
Before 1st IVF with ultrasound abnormalityRecommendedGrade B
After 2-4 IVF failuresMay be consideredGrade C

Hysteroscopy and Repeated Implantation Failure: A Proven Benefit?

But things change when we talk about repeated implantation failure (RIF).

RIF usually means you don’t get pregnant after three transfers of good embryos, or after transferring at least eight embryos overall.

Basically, it’s not just a one-time thing; it keeps happening even when things look good. So, in this case, the way doctors test and treat it might be different because the reasons could be more specific, and it needs a closer look.

Contradictory Data

A meta-analysis by Cao and colleagues (2018) reported a relative risk of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.03-1.62) in favor of hysteroscopy in patients with repeated failures. However, this analysis included observational studies and not exclusively randomized trials.

Paradoxically, the largest randomized study included (TROPHY study with 702 patients) found no significant difference.

My 30 Years of Clinical Experience

I’ve noticed that when I do hysteroscopies on women after they’ve had trouble with implantation, I find something unusual in about 25% of them.

That might sound like a lot, but usually, it’s something small. Also, fixing it doesn’t always mean they’ll have better luck getting pregnant.

Most Frequently Observed Abnormalities

So, looking back at the data, we often see a few things pop up:

But, it’s important to know that not all of these things affect the outlook in the same way.

What Is the Real Benefit of Treatment?

How much it helps really depends on what kind of problem we find:

🔬 My Clinical Perspective

So, even though it might not work the first time, hysteroscopy is generally better at helping to figure out what’s going on and what to do next, instead of being a quick fix for getting pregnant.

The best thing about it is that it helps doctors check for any rare problems that can be fixed. This can be really useful because it assures you that the doctors have checked everything carefully.

What Abnormalities Can Hysteroscopy Reveal?

Classification of Uterine Abnormalities

Type of AbnormalityFrequency in RIFImpact on IVFTreatment
Endometrial polyps10-15%⚠️ Moderate to high (especially if > 10 mm)Hysteroscopic polypectomy
Submucous fibroids3-5%⚠️⚠️ High (cavity distortion)Hysteroscopic myomectomy
Uterine synechiae5-10%⚠️⚠️ High (reduced implantation surface)Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
Chronic endometritis15-25%⚠️ ModerateAntibiotics (doxycycline)
Partial uterine septum1-3%⚠️⚠️ HighHysteroscopic septoplasty
Abnormal mucosal appearance8-12%? UncertainNo specific treatment

Focus: Chronic Endometritis

Chronic Endometritis: An Often Silent Cause

Chronic endometritis is when the lining of your uterus gets inflamed, but it’s sneaky because it usually doesn’t cause many symptoms. Sometimes, you might not even know you have it.

If you look at the tissue under a microscope, you’ll see plasma cells where they shouldn’t be. That’s a sign that there’s some inflammation going on for a while.

How Common Is It?

The rate of this issue changes a lot depending on who you’re looking at:

This big difference makes you think it might cause problems with the fertilized egg attaching to the uterus, but whether it actually causes the problem is still up for debate.

How Is It Diagnosed?

To figure out what’s going on, doctors use specific tests:

Keep in mind that just looking at it isn’t enough to know for sure. The biopsy is still the best way to confirm a diagnosis.

What Is the Treatment?

The usual treatment involves antibiotics, most often:

After you finish the antibiotics, your doctor might want to do another check (either with a hysteroscopy or a biopsy, depending on your situation) to make sure the inflammation is gone.

The info we have is still coming together, but first studies show that some patients have a better chance of getting pregnant after the treatment, which is good news.

Hysteroscopic comparison between a normal uterine cavity and an endometrial polyp visible before IVF

Hysteroscopy vs Ultrasound: What Is the Difference?

Comparative Table of Examinations

CriteriaTransvaginal UltrasoundHysterosalpingography (HSG)Diagnostic Hysteroscopy
PrincipleUltrasound waves through the wallX-ray with contrast agentDirect visualization by camera
Sensitivity for abnormalities35%40%100% (by definition)
Specificity82%86%100% (reference examination)
Tubal patency❌ No✅ Yes❌ No (except visible hydrosalpinx)
PainNoneModerate (cramps)Mild to moderate
AnesthesiaNoNoNo (office hysteroscopy)
Duration5-10 min15-20 min5-10 min
Approximate cost$50-100$150-250$200-400

The Complementarity of Examinations

In my practice, I favor a progressive and reasoned approach. The goal is not to multiply examinations, but to use them at the right time.

1️⃣ Transvaginal Ultrasound: The Foundation

A transvaginal ultrasound is still the best first step. It’s a normal, simple test that gives us a ton of info about your uterus and endometrium.

Most of the time, it helps us spot things that are clearly not right and tells us what other tests we might need.

2️⃣ Hysteroscopy: Targeted, Not Automatic

I usually suggest a hysteroscopy if:

It’s not something I do for everyone, but it is helpful when I need a closer look.

3️⃣ Hysterosalpingography: A Different Purpose

Hysterosalpingography has a specific job. It mainly checks if your fallopian tubes are open. While it gives a quick look at your uterus, it’s not really meant for a detailed inspection.


💭 A Metaphor for Better Understanding

I usually put it this way:

Think of ultrasound as looking at your house from the curb. Then, hysteroscopy is like walking through each room with a flashlight.

You’re bound to see more stuff – even little things you couldn’t spot from outside.

But here’s the thing: Do you really need to scout every corner of a house to know if you can live there?

That’s where things get tricky in fertility treatment. It’s about figuring out how much looking around is enough to actually help.

Combined Sensitivity

A study in Tunisia in 2012 looked at how well ultrasound and HSG, used together, could find problems, using hysteroscopy as the standard test.

If at least one of the ultrasound or HSG tests came back with an abnormal result, the combined method was able to correctly identify about 73% of the issues that hysteroscopy could see.

Basically, this approach catches almost three out of four problems that a hysteroscopy would find.

What Does This Number Mean in Practice?

So, about 27% of issues found during hysteroscopy aren’t spotted by ultrasound and HSG together.

These often include:

Usually, they’re not big problems, but more like small things that you can only see when you look directly inside the womb.

This then begs the question: do these overlooked issues actually affect whether someone can have a baby?

That’s where the experts still disagree.


How Is a Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Performed?

Before the Examination

When Should Hysteroscopy Be Performed?

The best time to do it is usually between day 5 and day 14 of your cycle, so during the early follicular phase.

Why this time frame?

This timeframe gives the best situation for getting clear results and doing the procedure well.


Is Any Special Preparation Required?

Usually, you don’t have to do anything special to get ready.

For a diagnostic hysteroscopy done through vaginoscopy:

The exam is usually quick, not too bad, and can be done right in the office.

During the Examination (Vaginoscopic Technique)

How Is a Modern Hysteroscopy Performed?

These days, when doctors use a hysteroscope to look inside the uterus, they usually use a method called the vaginoscopic technique. It’s a lot easier on the patient than older ways of doing it.

1️⃣ A Speculum-Free Approach

Actually, you usually don’t need a speculum. The hysteroscope, which is this really thin tool (like, 3.5 mm or less), goes right into the vagina, so it’s not as uncomfortable.

2️⃣ Gentle Distension of the Cavity

To get a clear view, we use sterile saline solution. This fluid carefully expands the uterus, kind of like opening it up so we can see things better.

3️⃣ A Progressive Exploration

The exam goes step-by-step:

4️⃣ A Biopsy If Necessary

If doubt persists — particularly in cases of suspected chronic endometritis — an endometrial sample can be taken using a pipelle for histological analysis.

Diagram showing the procedure of a diagnostic hysteroscopy via vaginoscopic approach without speculum

⏱️ How Long Does the Examination Take?

The whole thing usually takes about 5 to 15 minutes.

Most of the time, it’s done right in the office, so you don’t have to go to the hospital or be put to sleep.

Sensations and Pain

A British study from 2021 by Mahmud and his team looked at how much pain women feel during hysteroscopies, and the results are pretty interesting.

The study found that 87% of women said they felt some pain during the procedure. Of those women:

These numbers remind us that even though it’s a diagnostic procedure, hysteroscopy can be painful.

Pain That Varies Greatly from Patient to Patient

From what I’ve seen, everyone experiences this differently. Some people feel a little discomfort for a short time, but others say it’s much more intense.

A few things can make it feel worse:

On the bright side, these things can help:

Basically, how it’s done and the setting make a big difference.

💡 Practical Tip

Here’s a tip that’s simple but works well:

Try slow, deep breathing during the exam.

This kind of breathing can help your pelvic floor relax and make you feel less pain. It’s a small thing that can really help!

After the Examination

What Are the Usual After-Effects of Hysteroscopy?

Most people experience only minor and temporary symptoms after the procedure.

Here’s what you might expect:

These symptoms are normal and should go away on their own.


What About Complications?

These are still pretty rare, happening less than 0.5% of the time.

The most reported problems are:

It’s good to remember that these things don’t happen often, especially if the exam is done right.


Clinical Decision Tree

Here is my personalized approach based on 30 years of experience and ESHRE 2023 recommendations:

Clinical SituationIndicationExpected Benefit
Suspicious ultrasound abnormalityPolyp, fibroid, abnormal endometrial thicknessHigh: diagnosis and treatment
Abnormal ultrasound or HSGCavity distortion, suspicious imageHigh: confirmation and treatment
≥ 3 failed transfers of good-quality embryosSearch for subtle abnormalityModerate: 24% abnormalities detected
History of uterine surgeryCesarean section, myomectomy, curettageModerate: risk of synechiae
Intermenstrual bleedingSpotting, metrorrhagiaHigh: polyps are common

⚠️ Hysteroscopy TO BE DISCUSSED

Clinical SituationIndicationExpected Benefit
1-2 IVF failures with good-quality embryosComprehensive workupLow: little impact on prognosis
Age > 38 before first IVFCavity assessmentLow: age does not increase cavity abnormalities
Patient request after normal workupReassurancePsychological: relief of having checked everything
Clinical SituationReason
Before 1st IVF with normal ultrasoundNo demonstrated benefit (inSIGHT, TROPHY studies)
Routinely in the infertility workupNot cost-effective
After 1 single IVF failureToo early, other causes to explore first

My Personalized Approach

My “3-2-1” Clinical Rule

I use a simple 3-2-1 rule to decide when to suggest a hysteroscopy.

It helps me avoid doing unnecessary tests but still catch things when they’re important.

🔹 3 Transfers Without Pregnancy

If you’ve had three good embryo transfers and still aren’t pregnant, I suggest getting a hysteroscopy.

At this point, it makes sense to look closely and make sure there isn’t anything inside your uterus that’s stopping the embryos from implanting.

🔹 2 Associated Ultrasound Abnormalities

If an ultrasound spots two things that look suspicious, like a polyp along with a thickened endometrium, then a hysteroscopy is a good idea.

The point here isn’t just to look around, but to confirm what the ultrasound saw and deal with it if needed.

🔹 1 Surgical History + 1 IVF Failure

If a patient has had surgery on their uterus before—like a curettage, myomectomy, or a tough C-section—and their first IVF didn’t work, I think about doing a hysteroscopy.

We need to be extra careful because there’s a risk of synechiae or other scarring problems.


A Personalized Rather Than Routine Approach

With this plan, I can focus on patients who really need the help, and not do extra tests on people who are probably fine based on their ultrasound and situation.

In fertility treatments, it’s a constant balancing act: do enough investigation, but not too much treatment.

Decision tree to determine whether hysteroscopy is necessary before IVF based on your situation

Can Hysteroscopy Improve Implantation? The “Endometrial Injury” Debate

The Theory of Mechanical Alteration

Some older studies had a cool idea: hysteroscopy might help with implantation, even if everything looks normal.

The thought is that it’s like giving the endometrium a little nudge, what they call endometrial injury, to get things going.

What Is the Biological Hypothesis?

Here’s the main idea:

Making a small change to the lining of the uterus could cause a short-term inflammation in that area.

This inflammation could then cause:

Basically, this small change could signal the body to prep the uterus for pregnancy.


Keep in mind that while this idea makes sense biologically, newer studies have taken a second look and found more complex results.

What Do Recent Data Show?

Okay, so big, well-done studies have given us a straight answer.

The inSIGHT, TROPHY, and Ben Abid (2021) studies all showed there’s really no built-in advantage to getting a normal hysteroscopy.

Basically, even if the exam looks good and there’s been some minor mechanical trauma, pregnancy rates don’t really get better.

An Appealing Theory… But a Fragile One

Looking back, the idea of controlled trauma was mainly based on:

Big trials with many centers and better designs have usually found that a regular diagnostic hysteroscopy by itself doesn’t make implantation more likely.

What About the “Endometrial Injury” Concept?

Okay, so the discussion isn’t really over, but it’s mostly about different methods, like:

These procedures aren’t the same as a basic diagnostic hysteroscopy. Because of this, you can’t just apply the same biological reasons and patient info from one to the other.


In Summary

Turns out, the idea that a regular hysteroscopy can boost implantation on its own isn’t really backed up by solid proof.

This finding supports taking a careful approach: hysteroscopy is good for figuring out what’s going on, but don’t count on it to be a treatment by itself.

FAQ: Your Most Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is hysteroscopy before IVF mandatory?

No, hysteroscopy is not mandatory before IVF. According to ESHRE 2023 recommendations, it is not indicated as routine practice before the first attempt if your ultrasound is normal. It becomes relevant after several failed embryo transfers or in the presence of ultrasound abnormalities.


2. Does hysteroscopy increase my chances of IVF success?

Not before the first IVF with a normal ultrasound. High-quality multicenter studies (inSIGHT with 750 patients, TROPHY with 702 patients) demonstrated that there is no difference in live birth rates between women who had or did not have a screening hysteroscopy.

However, if hysteroscopy detects and treats a real abnormality (polyp, fibroid, synechiae), then yes, treating that abnormality can improve your chances.


3. After how many IVF failures should I have a hysteroscopy?

The recommendation is to consider hysteroscopy after 2 to 4 failed transfers of good-quality embryos, especially if your initial ultrasound was normal. At this stage, hysteroscopy reveals abnormalities in approximately 24% of cases (TROPHY study), of which 4% are directly treatable.

In my clinic, I generally apply the rule of 3 failed transfers without pregnancy with good-morphology embryos as the threshold for recommending this examination.


4. Is hysteroscopy painful?

Every woman’s experience with pain is different. Around 87% of women feel some discomfort during the exam, rating the pain at about 4.7 out of 10. Some just feel a little pressure, while others have stronger cramps, like period pain.

What affects the pain level:

Quick tip: Taking a regular painkiller like paracetamol an hour before can help ease the discomfort.


5. Hysteroscopy or ultrasound before IVF: which should I choose?

A transvaginal ultrasound is usually the first test done when starting IVF. It’s:

A hysteroscopy is usually the next test , and it is only done if:

You don’t have to pick one. Your doctor will advise hysteroscopy if needed after checking your ultrasound results.


6. What abnormalities can hysteroscopy detect that ultrasound cannot?

Hysteroscopy can show things like:

About 27% of issues found with hysteroscopy don’t show up on ultrasound and hysterosalpingography together.


7. Should I have a hysteroscopy before my first IVF?

No, you don’t need a routine hysteroscopy before your first IVF if your ultrasound looks good. Solid research says it doesn’t help your chances of success.

But, I would advise it beforehand if:


9. What are the risks of diagnostic hysteroscopy?

Diagnostic hysteroscopy (vaginoscopy) is generally a really safe exam. Problems don’t happen often (less than 0.5% of the time).

Minor issues:

Major issues (really rare):

A review of studies that included 1,872 patients found that in three of those studies, there were no problems at all. In the fourth study, only one person got endometritis.


10. Can I skip hysteroscopy and go straight to IVF?

Yep, sounds good! If your transvaginal ultrasound looks normal and it’s your first time with IVF, you can go right ahead with the treatment. You don’t need a hysteroscopy as a standard checkup, that’s what’s usually advised.

But, I would suggest a hysteroscopy if:

The main thing is that you and your doctor talk it over together and decide what’s best for you, based on your situation.


Alternatives to Hysteroscopy

Sonohysterography (Saline Infusion Sonography)

Sonohysterography is basically a vaginal ultrasound that’s done after they put some saline solution into your uterus. The fluid helps to stretch things out so the doctor can see any issues more clearly.

What’s good about it:

What’s not so good:

My take: If you’re nervous about getting a hysteroscopy, sonohysterography is a really good middle-ground option compared to a regular ultrasound.

Pelvic MRI

MRI gives us a really clear look at the uterus and surrounding areas.

Good Points:

Not-So-Good Points:

When I use it: If I think someone has a lot of fibroids or adenomyosis and we’re thinking about surgery.


My Holistic Approach After 30 Years of Practice

Beyond the simple question of “hysteroscopy yes or no,” I believe in a personalized and progressive approach:

Step 1: The Baseline Workup (All Patients)

Step 2: The First IVF Attempt

If the workup is normal → IVF attempt without hysteroscopy

Why? Because scientific data show that routine hysteroscopy does not improve your chances. Let’s start with IVF itself.

Step 3: After 1-2 Failures

Thinking it Through:

Hysteroscopy might be a good idea if:

Step 4: After ≥ 3 Failures

Hysteroscopy systematically recommended as part of the repeated implantation failure workup, accompanied by:

💡 Philosophy of care: Each patient is unique. Statistics guide, but it is your personal history — your symptoms, your results, your expectations — that shapes my recommendations.


Conclusion: An Informed and Personalized Decision

Screening hysteroscopy before IVF is an excellent diagnostic tool, but recent scientific data teach us the importance of not performing it routinely.

What We Know with Certainty

✍️ Summary Conclusion

After analyzing the scientific data and clinical experience, several key points emerge.

🔎 Before a First IVF

Routine hysteroscopy in patients with a normal ultrasound does not improve live birth rates.

The level of evidence is high (grade A). In this context, it should not be offered routinely.


🔁 After Repeated Failures

About 24% of women who have trouble getting pregnant after multiple IVF attempts have uterine issues that can be seen with a hysteroscopy.

Whether or not treating these problems actually helps is still up for debate. The evidence is okay, but not great (grade B-C).


🎯 When a Significant Abnormality Is Identified

But, if the exam finds something obviously wrong—like a polyp bigger than 10 mm, a submucous fibroid, or intrauterine synechiae—and it gets fixed, then there’s a clear and proven health benefit.

When used in these specific cases, hysteroscopy really does what it’s supposed to do, both for finding the problem and fixing it.


🛡️ A Generally Safe Examination

Finally, it is important to remember that diagnostic hysteroscopy is a safe examination, with a very low complication rate (less than 0.5%).


🎯 Key Message

Hysteroscopy isn’t some magical fix, but it’s definitely not worthless either.

It’s helpful when used for the right reason, as part of a plan that fits you.

Don’t just do it automatically. Don’t ignore it when it could help. Do it when it makes sense for you.

✍️ The Real Questions That Remain Open

❓ What Is the Optimal Time to Recommend Hysteroscopy After Failures?

So, how many failed transfers should you have before considering other options? Two, three, or even four?

Well, there’s no easy answer.

Research shows that not much can be learned from testing before three transfers of good embryos. But after three failed attempts, it makes sense to start looking into specific causes.

Really, the call depends on a few things:

Basically, it is not just about the number of tries, but the whole picture.


❓ Do All Detected Abnormalities Deserve Treatment?

This is probably one of the most delicate points.

Some lesions have a clearly demonstrated impact:

Their treatment objectively improves the uterine environment.

On the other hand, for minor abnormalities — small polyps, slightly irregular mucosa, filiform synechiae — the line is blurrier.

Are these true causes of failure… or simply anatomical variations with no clinical consequence?

The risk exists of over-interpreting subtle images and treating “false positives” that would probably not have changed the outcome.


❓ Chronic Endometritis: A Real Cause or Just a Marker?

People are still arguing about this question.

It’s interesting that it shows up more often in patients who have repeatedly failed. This makes you think there might be a link. But just because two things are related doesn’t mean one causes the other.

Three hypotheses coexist:

  1. Chronic endometritis is a direct cause of impaired receptivity.
  2. It is a contributing factor, among others.
  3. It constitutes an epiphenomenon, reflecting an inflammatory state or an unfavorable reproductive context.

Early data on antibiotic therapy are encouraging, but they do not yet allow the assertion of a universal benefit.


🎯 In Reality…

These three questions show that deciding to do a hysteroscopy should not be automatic.

It should be a personal decision that considers:

In reproductive medicine, nuance is often more important than a definitive answer.

✍️ Message to Patients

If you are undergoing IVF or facing implantation failures, here is what I want you to remember.

1️⃣ Don’t Feel Obligated

If your ultrasound is normal, there is no urgency or obligation to have a hysteroscopy before a first IVF. Scientific data are reassuring: it does not improve birth rates in this context.


2️⃣ Trust the Progressive Process

Reproductive medicine works in stages. Starting IVF, analyzing results, then adjusting the strategy if necessary is often the most reasonable approach.

Not everything needs to be investigated upfront.


3️⃣ After 2 to 3 Failures, the Thinking Changes

However, after two or three unsuccessful transfers, hysteroscopy becomes a relevant part of the implantation failure workup.

At this stage, it is logical to verify that no subtle abnormality has been overlooked.


4️⃣ If There Is an Abnormality on Ultrasound

If an abnormality is suspected from the start — polyp, atypical endometrium, questionable image — then hysteroscopy is recommended, including before a first IVF.

In this case, it is no longer exploratory, but targeted.


5️⃣ The Decision Must Be Shared

Every journey is unique. Your age, your history, your tolerance for uncertainty, your need to explore “everything right away” or conversely to proceed step by step… all of this matters.

The best decision is one that is discussed and understood, not imposed.


🌿 In Summary

As I often tell my patients:

“Hysteroscopy is neither a miracle nor a mandatory step. It is a valuable tool, to be used at the right time, for the right reasons.”


Publication Date: February 8, 2026

This article was written by Dr. Senai Aksoy for informational purposes. Each patient is unique. IVF outcomes vary depending on many factors. Always consult a specialist regarding your personal situation.

© Assoc. Prof. Dr. Senai Aksoy - All rights reserved.

Dr. Senai Aksoy

Dr. Senai Aksoy

Dr. Senai Aksoy is a renowned expert in the field of reproductive medicine, with over 20 years of experience. He has dedicated his career to helping couples achieve their dreams of parenthood through advanced fertility treatments and personalized care.

The content has been created by Dr. Senai Aksoy and medically approved.