Frozen Embryos in IVF: When Freezing Helps and What the Tradeoffs Are
Key Takeaways
Vitrification lets embryos be stored and transferred later, when the lining can be prepared without the hormones of stimulation. Freeze-all is useful when OHSS risk is high, progesterone is raised, genetic testing is planned, or the cavity needs time. For people with a typical response and an undisturbed lining, cumulative live birth is similar with a first fresh or frozen transfer. In women with a low response, a 2025 randomised trial favoured a fresh transfer.
Key evidence: Cochrane Systematic Review — Fresh vs Frozen Embryo Transfers (2021) ESHRE Guideline: Ovarian Stimulation for IVF/ICSI, 2025 Update BMJ - Frozen vs Fresh Embryo Transfer in Low-Prognosis Women (2025)
Fresh vs Frozen Embryo Transfer in IVF: How to Choose
This video was recorded in French. Check the YouTube player settings for any translated audio or subtitles available for this video.
On this page
- How embryo freezing works
- Why embryos are frozen: key clinical indications
- Clinical advantages of frozen embryo transfer
- Dr. Aksoy’s clinical perspective
- Tradeoffs and realistic considerations
- What the clinical evidence shows
- Preparing for a frozen transfer cycle
- Related reading
- Frequently asked questions
- Sources
Frozen Embryos in IVF: An Evolving Standard
Freezing embryos is no longer just a backup for spare embryos. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) is now a main strategy in IVF, because it lets doctors separate the stimulation phase from the phase in which the embryo implants in the uterus.
Vitrification made this shift possible. It is an ultra-rapid freezing method that avoids the formation of ice crystals. A meta-analysis found that embryos survive warming better after vitrification than after the older slow-freezing method (Rienzi et al., 2017). The exact survival rate still varies with the laboratory and the embryo stage.
Whether to freeze all embryos or go ahead with a fresh transfer depends on your own cycle, not on a universal policy.
How Embryo Freezing Works
Embryos are usually cultured to the blastocyst stage (day 5 or 6), treated with cryoprotectant solutions, and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen at -196°C until transfer.
Ovarian Stimulation & Retrieval
│
▼
Fertilization (IVF / ICSI)
│
▼
Extended Culture to Day 5/6 (Blastocyst)
│
▼
Vitrification (Ultra-Rapid Freezing)
│
▼
Storage in Liquid Nitrogen (-196°C)
│
▼
Thawing & Assessment Before Transfer
During vitrification, most of the water inside the embryo’s cells is drawn out and replaced with protective solutions (cryoprotectants). The embryo is then plunged into liquid nitrogen almost instantly. This avoids the ice-crystal damage to cell membranes that was a problem with older slow-freezing protocols.
At -196°C, biological activity is effectively suspended. Births have been reported after many years of storage, and storage time alone has not been shown to lower embryo quality. Legal storage limits and consent renewal still apply (see the FAQ below).
Why Embryos Are Frozen: Key Clinical Indications
Embryos are frozen mainly to lower late-onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk, avoid transfer into a lining that is not yet ready, allow time for genetic testing, or keep embryos for a later pregnancy.
- Reducing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk: In patients at high risk, avoiding an immediate pregnancy can reduce late-onset OHSS. The 2025 ESHRE update strongly recommends freeze-all to minimise late-onset OHSS (the evidence is of low certainty) and an agonist trigger in women at risk. It is one part of a broader prevention strategy and does not eliminate risk in every case (ESHRE, 2025).
- A possible shift in endometrial timing: Some studies use progesterone values such as 1.5 ng/mL as a reference, but there is no universal pass-or-fail threshold. The result must be interpreted with the assay, ovarian response and clinic protocol in view (Roque et al., 2019).
- Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT): A few cells are biopsied from the outer layer of the blastocyst (trophectoderm) on day 5 or 6, to screen for chromosomal changes (PGT-A) or a known inherited condition (PGT-M). The results take time, so the embryos are normally frozen while the laboratory waits for them.
- Suboptimal Endometrial Conditions: If monitoring reveals an unexpected uterine polyp, fluid in the cavity or an unusually thin lining, freezing the embryos gives the team time to treat the problem (for example by hysteroscopy) before a transfer is attempted.
- Preserving Reproductive Potential for the Future: When a cycle yields several good-quality blastocysts, freezing lets patients try for a second or third pregnancy years later without another stimulation or egg retrieval.
Clinical Advantages of Frozen Embryo Transfer
A frozen transfer lets the uterus return to a more physiological hormone profile, without the high estrogen of stimulation.
- Physiological Hormone Levels: Stimulation produces supraphysiological estrogen and progesterone concentrations. Separating egg collection from transfer lets the lining be prepared in a calmer, controlled cycle.
- Flexible Scheduling and Monitoring: A frozen transfer can be timed to when you are ready and the lining is ready, without the tight deadlines of an active retrieval cycle.
- Perinatal Outcomes: A meta-analysis of singleton pregnancies found lower rates of preterm birth, low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age babies after frozen transfer than after fresh transfer. The same analysis found higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and large-for-gestational-age babies (Maheshwari et al., 2018).
Dr. Aksoy’s clinical perspective
Dr. Aksoy finds freeze-all most useful when the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) matters clinically, or when something else in the cycle makes postponing the transfer sensible. A progesterone result is read in context, not as a universal threshold, and routine freezing is not necessary for every patient.
For women with a typical response and an undisturbed lining, cumulative live birth is comparable with a fresh transfer. When hormone levels are supraphysiological, fluid is present in the endometrial cavity or preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is planned, freezing the embryos lets the uterus reset, so the transfer can take place in a more receptive, physiological environment.
Tradeoffs and Realistic Considerations
Frozen transfers add waiting time, storage and thawing costs, and a slightly different obstetric profile that depends on how the lining is prepared.
| Consideration | Clinical implication | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment delay | The transfer usually waits at least one menstrual cycle after retrieval. | Time for your body to recover and hormone levels to settle. |
| Thaw survival | A small fraction of embryos may not survive warming. | Laboratories usually freeze blastocysts that look robust; the embryologist checks the embryo after warming. |
| Logistics and cost | Freezing, storage and a separate FET cycle carry fees. | These should be listed before treatment starts. |
| Obstetric profile | Frozen transfers carry a higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and large babies than fresh transfers (Maheshwari et al., 2018; Zaat et al., 2021). Programmed (HRT) cycles, which have no corpus luteum, have been linked to more gestational hypertension than natural cycles (Hsueh et al., 2023). A 2026 meta-analysis of 17 trials pointed the same way (RR 0.77 for hypertensive disorders with ovulatory preparation), but the difference was not statistically significant (Martins and Nastri, 2026). | Where ovulation is regular, a natural or modified natural FET keeps the corpus luteum and its hormones. |
If you are travelling for treatment, freezing embryos often means two visits: about a week for retrieval and freezing, then a shorter trip later for the transfer. The IVF in Turkey guide and how to plan IVF abroad cover those logistics.
What the Clinical Evidence Shows
Randomised trials and reviews give different answers depending on who is treated:
- High responders and PCOS: In a trial of 1,508 women with PCOS, the first frozen transfer gave more live births than the first fresh transfer (49.3% vs 42.0%) and far less OHSS (1.3% vs 7.1%), but more pre-eclampsia (4.4% vs 1.4%) (Chen et al., 2016). In other groups the size of any live-birth advantage depends on the population and outcome measured (Roque et al., 2019; Zaat et al., 2021).
- Typical responders: In 2,157 ovulatory women the live-birth rate after the first transfer did not differ (48.7% frozen vs 50.2% fresh), although OHSS was less common with freezing (0.6% vs 2.0%) (Shi et al., 2018). Counting every later frozen transfer from the same retrieval, a 2025 randomised trial also found no difference in cumulative live birth (42.6% vs 41.7%), but the first pregnancy came later with freeze-all (median 106 vs 29 days) (Stormlund et al., 2025). The Cochrane review agrees that cumulative live birth is probably similar (Zaat et al., 2021; ASRM Practice Committee, 2021).
- Low responders: In a 2025 randomised trial of 838 women with a low prognosis (nine or fewer eggs, or poor ovarian reserve), live birth was lower with freeze-all than with fresh transfer (32% vs 40%), as was cumulative live birth within a year (44% vs 51%) (Wei et al., 2025). A 2026 systematic review reached the same conclusion (Sun et al., 2026). A fresh transfer may therefore be the better choice for these women unless there is a separate reason to freeze, such as a uterine problem or genetic testing.
Preparing for a Frozen Transfer Cycle
Endometrial preparation aims to bring the lining into step with the embryo. Thickness and ultrasound pattern are read alongside the full clinical picture; 7–8 mm is not a universal pass-or-fail threshold.
Depending on how regularly you ovulate, three main protocols are used (Hsueh et al., 2023):
- Natural Cycle FET: Relies on your own ovulation and corpus luteum, so it needs little medication. A 2026 meta-analysis of 17 randomised trials (10,611 participants) found fewer pregnancy losses with ovulatory preparation (RR 0.75), similar live birth overall (RR 1.07) and a non-significant trend towards less hypertension in pregnancy (Martins and Nastri, 2026).
- Modified Natural Cycle FET: Spontaneous follicle growth, plus an hCG trigger injection to pin down the timing of ovulation.
- Programmed (Hormone Replacement Therapy) FET: Oral or transdermal estrogen builds the lining, and progesterone then opens the implantation window. It suits women with irregular cycles or ovulation problems.
Medication schedules and cycle choices are covered in our guide to preparing the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer.
Related Reading
- Fresh vs Frozen Embryo Transfer: How Doctors Choose
- Preparing the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: HRT, Natural, and Hybrid Cycles
- Embryo Transfer Timing in IVF: When Day 3 or Day 5 Makes More Sense
- How to Plan IVF Abroad: Step-by-Step Logistics and Scheduling
Frequently Asked Questions for Dr. Aksoy
How does the IVF process work with frozen embryos?
If you have frozen embryos, we usually do not need to repeat the egg collection. This time the aim is not to create new embryos, but to prepare the uterus to transfer one of the embryos we obtained and froze earlier.
First we assess the lining of the uterus. If your periods are regular, in some cases we can follow your natural ovulation cycle and do the transfer then. In other patients I prefer to prepare the lining with medicines such as estrogen and progesterone.
When the uterus is ready, our embryologists thaw the frozen embryo. With vitrification, the method we use today, the great majority of embryos come through thawing in good condition. But we cannot guarantee that every embryo will survive.
If the embryo is in good condition, we place it in the uterus with a thin catheter. This is usually quick and does not need anaesthesia. Afterwards, we continue progesterone support according to the protocol used. The pregnancy test is usually done about 9 to 12 days after a blastocyst transfer.
Another question patients often ask is whether a frozen embryo is of lower quality than a fresh one. No. The fact that an embryo has been frozen does not, on its own, mean a lower chance of success. Today we get quite good results with frozen embryo transfers.
In short, a frozen embryo transfer is usually a shorter and easier process than a new IVF stimulation. But the chance of success still depends on the quality of the eggs at the age the embryos were obtained, on the characteristics of the embryo and on factors related to the uterus.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do frozen embryos have the same success rate as fresh embryos?
In people with a typical ovarian response, cumulative live birth is similar whether the first transfer is fresh or frozen. In high responders or cycles with raised progesterone, a frozen transfer may be safer and, in some groups, associated with higher live birth; the size of any advantage depends on the population and the outcome measured. In women with a low response, a 2025 randomised trial found a lower live-birth rate with freeze-all.
How long can frozen embryos remain safely stored?
At liquid-nitrogen temperatures, biological activity is effectively suspended. Long-storage birth reports are reassuring, but legal limits, consent renewal and clinic policy vary; storage duration should be discussed with the clinic.
What is the risk of an embryo not surviving the thaw?
Most embryos survive warming after vitrification in an experienced laboratory, but the rate varies with the laboratory and the embryo. Before the transfer, the embryologist checks how well the embryo has re-expanded and how it looks after warming.
Is frozen embryo transfer painful?
Most patients describe a frozen transfer as brief, with discomfort varying by speculum use, cervical sensitivity and bladder fullness. Anaesthesia is not usually needed, but tell the team if examinations are painful or difficult.
Does embryo freezing increase the risk of birth defects?
Large registry studies have generally found similar birth defect rates after frozen and fresh IVF, and a meta-analysis found no difference in congenital anomalies between the two (Maheshwari et al., 2018). The same analysis found fewer preterm births with frozen transfers. Blood pressure in pregnancy needs watching, particularly after programmed cycles.
Sources
- ASRM Practice Committee. “Comparison of fresh and frozen embryo transfers: a committee opinion.” Fertility and Sterility, 2021; 116(3):e65–e73. DOI
- Chen ZJ, et al. “Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome.” New England Journal of Medicine, 2016; 375(6):523-533. PubMed
- ESHRE Guideline Group on Ovarian Stimulation. “ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: an update in 2025.” Human Reproduction, 2026; 41(4):498-514. DOI
- Hsueh YW, et al. “Finding of the optimal preparation and timing of endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a literature review of clinical evidence.” Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2023; 14:1250847. PubMed
- Maheshwari A, et al. “Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?” Human Reproduction Update, 2018; 24(1):35-58. PubMed
- Martins WP, Nastri CO. “Endometrial preparation with vs without ovulation for frozen-embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2026. doi:10.1002/uog.70299. PubMed
- Rienzi L, et al. “Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.” Human Reproduction Update, 2017; 23(2):139-155. PubMed
- Roque M, et al. “Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes.” Human Reproduction Update, 2019; 25(1):2-14. PubMed
- Roque M, et al. “Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Fertility and Sterility, 2013; 99(1):156-162. PubMed
- Shi Y, et al. “Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women.” New England Journal of Medicine, 2018; 378(2):126-136. PubMed
- Stormlund S, et al. “Cumulative live birth rates in a freeze-all or fresh transfer strategy after one ART cycle in ovulatory women.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2025; 50(6):104449. PubMed
- Sun Y, et al. “Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in low responders: a systematic review.” Fertility and Sterility, 2026; 126(1):96-115. PubMed
- Wei D, et al. “Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with low prognosis for in vitro fertilisation treatment: pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.” BMJ, 2025; 388:e081474. PubMed
- Zaat T, et al. “Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021; 2:CD011184. PubMed
Add as a Preferred Source on Google
You can add draksoyivf.com as one of your preferred health information sources on Google.
The content has been created by Dr. Senai Aksoy and medically approved.