DHEA and Growth Hormone in IVF: What the Evidence Says

Medically reviewed on 8 October 2026 - Dr. Senai Aksoy
Clinical evaluation of adjuvant therapies including DHEA and growth hormone for poor ovarian responders in IVF

Key Takeaways

For low responders and women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR), DHEA and Growth Hormone (GH) have no clear proven benefit on live birth rates (LBR). DHEA may change oocyte yield, and GH may change stimulation measures, but the LIGHT trial and current ESHRE guidance do not support routine use. Optimizing the primary stimulation strategy and identifying cycle bottlenecks remain central.

Key evidence: Cochrane Systematic Review — Androgens & Adjuvants in IVF (2024) ESHRE Guideline — Ovarian Stimulation in ART LIGHT randomized controlled trial — Growth Hormone in poor responders

When preparing for IVF after a diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) or a previous low response to stimulation, it is natural to look for an extra option. DHEA and Growth Hormone (GH) are often discussed in patient forums and online groups.

However, high-quality evidence has not shown a clear live-birth benefit for either treatment. DHEA may change intermediate measures such as the number of retrieved oocytes, while studies of GH have reported changes in stimulation measures. The current ESHRE guideline update does not recommend DHEA for low responders and says GH is probably not recommended for them. The HFEA assessment of androgen supplementation rates DHEA black (no effect shown) for live birth and egg numbers in poor response or diminished reserve; it does not rate GH.

Video: DHEA and Growth Hormone in IVF for Poor Responders

DHEA and Growth Hormone in IVF for Poor Responders — Dr. Senai Aksoy

(Note: This video was recorded in French. English and Arabic audio tracks are available in the YouTube player settings.)

What are DHEA and Growth Hormone in IVF?

DHEA and Growth Hormone have been studied as experimental adjuvant therapies before or during ovarian stimulation. The proposed rationale is to influence follicle development, but a biological explanation does not establish a meaningful clinical benefit.

Does DHEA improve IVF success rates?

DHEA has not shown a clear improvement in live birth in well-conducted trials, even though some studies report a small numerical change in retrieved oocytes.

A comprehensive 2024 Cochrane Systematic Review (Naik et al.) included 28 randomized controlled trials of DHEA or testosterone. For DHEA versus placebo or no treatment, it found little to no difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy (9 trials, 1,433 women; OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.95–1.76; moderate-certainty evidence). After trials at high risk of bias were excluded, the estimate was 1.08 (95% CI 0.75–1.54; 6 trials, 1,127 women). Because the confidence interval still crosses no effect, this analysis does not show a clear clinical benefit.

Claims that DHEA reduces embryo aneuploidy (chromosomal errors) came from retrospective, case-control comparisons of miscarriage rates (Gleicher et al., 2009) and have not been shown in randomized trials; the Cochrane review found that DHEA probably does not reduce miscarriage.

Does Growth Hormone (GH) help poor responders?

Some studies of Growth Hormone have reported changes in stimulation dose or timing, but these intermediate differences have not translated into a clear live-birth benefit for low responders.

The double-blind, placebo-controlled LIGHT trial (Norman et al., 2019) found a live birth rate of 14.5% (9/62) with GH versus 13.7% (7/51) with placebo, a difference that was not statistically significant. The trial stopped before reaching its planned number of participants, so its wide confidence interval cannot rule out a small effect in either direction.

For DHEA and growth hormone specifically, this review by Conforti et al. did not establish a clear live-birth benefit. It did find a live-birth signal for testosterone, as did the 2024 Cochrane review (8 trials, 716 women; moderate-certainty evidence), but that result does not make testosterone a routine treatment; current ESHRE guidance says testosterone is probably not recommended for low responders.

Comparing DHEA vs. Growth Hormone

The following table summarizes the comparative clinical evidence for DHEA and Growth Hormone:

Clinical ParameterDHEAGrowth Hormone (GH)
Live-birth outcomeNo clear benefit shown in current randomized evidenceNo clear benefit shown in the LIGHT trial or current guidance
Current evidence statusESHRE: not recommended for low respondersESHRE says GH is probably not recommended for low responders
How to interpret secondary findingsChanges in egg numbers do not establish a live-birth benefitChanges in stimulation measures do not establish a live-birth benefit

Side effects and safety considerations

Both substances are active hormonal agents. Their risks, interactions and suitability should be reviewed with the treating clinician:

Professional guidelines (ESHRE, ASRM, HFEA)

Major international reproductive medicine bodies advise against the routine prescription of these adjuvants:

Dr. Aksoy’s Approach: Identifying Bottlenecks Instead of Stacking Adjuvants

Frequently Asked Questions for Dr. Aksoy

Does DHEA help you get pregnant or improve egg quality?

DHEA has been used for a long time, especially in women with low ovarian reserve, and some older studies reported more eggs or better embryo results. However, higher-quality randomised trials and recent meta-analyses have not shown that it meaningfully increases the live birth rate. For this reason, the 2025 ESHRE guideline does not recommend DHEA, even for low responders. Personal experiences such as “I took 25–75 mg and got pregnant” can be valuable, but they do not show that the medicine caused the pregnancy; in IVF, results already vary considerably from one cycle to the next without any add-on treatment.

For reference, the 2024 Cochrane review found little to no difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy with DHEA compared with placebo or no treatment (9 trials, 1,433 women; OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.95–1.76) (Naik et al., 2024), and ESHRE states that DHEA “is not recommended for low responders” (ESHRE 2025).

Can DHEA be taken during a period or during pregnancy, and when should it be stopped?

DHEA is not a medicine taken only at a particular point in the menstrual cycle; in studies it was usually given every day regardless of the cycle and continued during stimulation. This use is, however, off-label and not routinely recommended. DHEA should not be used once a pregnancy has started: it has androgenic effects and its safety in pregnancy has not been shown. If it has been started for IVF, the doctor managing the treatment should decide when to continue and when to stop it, and it should not be continued in pregnancy.

In the trials reviewed by Cochrane, DHEA was started before IVF and, where reported, continued until the end of ovarian stimulation (Naik et al., 2024); the HFEA notes that androgen supplementation is generally stopped when ovarian stimulation starts or at least before embryo transfer (HFEA).

How long does DHEA take to work, and how long before IVF is it started?

In studies, DHEA was most often started about 12 weeks before IVF, usually at 75 mg a day. However, we cannot conclude from this that “DHEA needs three months to work”. These periods come from research protocols, and current data do not show that this preparation increases live births. So, today there is no evidence-based recommendation that everyone should start DHEA three months before IVF.

The study protocols varied: in the Cochrane review two trials gave DHEA for 8 weeks, six for 12 weeks and one for 16 weeks, and most used a daily oral dose of 75 mg (Naik et al., 2024).

Sources

Next step

A question about your own case?

An article can set out the general picture, but not what applies to your own history. If you would like your situation looked at, you can send your questions and any previous reports to the medical team.

For privacy, please send only information needed for an initial reply. Ask the team which secure channel to use for medical reports or identity documents.

Request a medical review

Add as a Preferred Source on Google

You can add draksoyivf.com as one of your preferred health information sources on Google.

Add on Google
Dr. Senai Aksoy

Dr. Senai Aksoy studied and trained in France before returning to Turkey, where he was a member of the ICSI team at Sevgi Hospital, Ankara — the country's first ICSI centre (1994-95) — and a co-author on the first Turkish ICSI publications produced in collaboration with the Brussels Van Steirteghem group (Human Reproduction, 1996; PMID 8671323). He helped build the IVF programme at the American Hospital Istanbul and has been running his own fertility practice since 1998.

Verified profiles: PubMed ORCID LinkedIn

The content has been created by Dr. Senai Aksoy and medically approved.